Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS:Re C (A Child) [2012] EWCA Civ 535

Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2012EWCACiv535
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 14, 2012, 14:30 PM
Article ID : 98785

(Court of Appeal, Thorpe, Patten LJJ, 16 February 2012)

A fact-finding hearing concluded that the child had suffered non-accidental injuries caused by one of the parents. After the judge retired, at a subsequent hearing a different judge went further and said he thought the mother was the more likely perpetrator but would not rule the father out entirely.

The mother appealed. The findings not expressed in the resulting order and so were not ordinarily appealable. However, fairness to the mother required the offending paragraphs of the judgment to be struck out. The second judge had gone beyond the initial findings of the judge who had heard the evidence first hand. The mother's fundamental right to a fair trial had been breached and if the paragraphs remained in the judgment the mother's prospects of developing a harmonious relationship with the child and carers could be blighted. Appeal allowed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from