Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

PATERNITY:L v P (Paternity Test: Child's Objection) [2011] EWHC 3399 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:21 PM
Slug : 2011ewhc3399fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 8, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 99681

(Family Division, Hedley J, 28 July 2011) 

The issue arose whether the 15-year-old should be compelled to provide DNA to discover whether the man named on her birth certificate was in fact her father. The putative father had not had much contact during her life but the mother issued an application for child maintenance, arrears of which had accrued of £20,000.

The father applied for a declaration under s 55(a) of the Family Law Act 1996 that he was not the father. The mother had no objection to a DNA test but would not provide consent given the girl's strong objections.

The balance fell firmly in upholding the girl's refusal. Her objection was reasonable, the father had reaffirmed his position as her father throughout her life. There was only the thinnest of evidence that he may not be her father. Refusing to order DNA test.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from