Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

PATERNITY:L v P (Paternity Test: Child's Objection) [2011] EWHC 3399 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:21 PM
Slug : 2011ewhc3399fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 8, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 99681

(Family Division, Hedley J, 28 July 2011) 

The issue arose whether the 15-year-old should be compelled to provide DNA to discover whether the man named on her birth certificate was in fact her father. The putative father had not had much contact during her life but the mother issued an application for child maintenance, arrears of which had accrued of £20,000.

The father applied for a declaration under s 55(a) of the Family Law Act 1996 that he was not the father. The mother had no objection to a DNA test but would not provide consent given the girl's strong objections.

The balance fell firmly in upholding the girl's refusal. Her objection was reasonable, the father had reaffirmed his position as her father throughout her life. There was only the thinnest of evidence that he may not be her father. Refusing to order DNA test.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from