Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE:P v Independent Print Ltd and Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 756, [2012] COPLR 110

Sep 29, 2018, 21:32 PM
Slug : 2011ewcaciv756-1
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 25, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 98937

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Carnwath, Tomlinson LJJ, 4 July 2011)

The young man had been born into a severely dysfunctional family and suffered from severe uncontrolled epilepsy. He was taken into care and was subsequently adopted. His adoptive mother disagreed with the treatment he was being provided with and without any supervision by medics withdrew all of his current medication. He was admitted to hospital with life threatening epileptic seizures and the local authority brought proceedings to determine his future.

The young man was ordered to live independently from his adoptive mother and on the date of the review, without prior warning, the Independent newspaper sought permission to attend and report on the hearing. The judge refused to adjourn and granted the newspaper permission to report subject to certain restrictions. The young man appealed.

The judge had properly considered the relevant factors and his decision not to adjourn had been fair and proper. In making his decision the judge had carefully balanced the young man's Art 8 rights with the Art 10 rights of the media and had come to the correct conclusion.

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from