Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Re PW (Adoption) [2011] EWHC 3793 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:29 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC3793Fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 23, 2012, 04:00 AM
Article ID : 97901

(Family Division; Parker J; 12 October 2011)

The 69-year-old woman was orphaned when she was 17 and the parents of her closest friend offered her a home and applied for an adoption order. The order was granted and the woman remained with the adoptive family until she was 23 when she left home and was married. She married in her adoptive name and her children have that name on their birth certificates. After her adoptive mother died the woman challenged the adoption order which she claimed should not have been made and had a devastating effect on her life. She claimed that her wishes and feelings were not ascertained prior to the order and that she felt pressurised and influenced by her adoptive parents who very much wished to adopt her to the extent that she felt unable to gainsay their wishes. The only available remedy was permission to appeal out of time. The adoption had provided considerable benefits and support for the woman and there were strong policy reasons why adoption orders should not be set aside. The court had to assume the order was validly made on a proper and appropriate basis under the law as it was at the time. There was no prospect of success on appeal and so no basis to grant an extension of time for permission to appeal. Application refused.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from