Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

SURROGACY: RE TT (Surrogacy) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:03 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC33
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 1, 2011, 06:23 AM
Article ID : 93705

(Family Division; Baker J; 21 January 2011)

A surrogacy agreement provided for the surrogate mother to be impregnated using the man's sperm and for the child to be handed over to man and his wife. The surrogate mother changed her mind during the pregnancy and refused to hand over child. The father applied for a residence order.

The father's application for residence was refused and a residence order was made in the mother's favour with defined contact to the father. The decision was based on the child's welfare and particularly her emotional needs, regarding which the father and his wife had shown remarkably little insight. Concern was expressed about the parties' use of the internet.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from