Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION/ HABITUAL RESIDENCE: FVS v MGS [2011] EWHC 3139 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:16 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC3139
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2011, 13:28 PM
Article ID : 97497

(Family Division; Holman J; 18 November 2011)

The Spanish parents lived together for 18 years, had one child and were not married. The parents moved to UK for a fixed period for the father's employment. There was a chance to increase the period and the father was keen but the mother wished to return to Spain but agreed to remain in UK as the child was enrolled at school. The parents had major a argument prior to travelling to Spain for a holiday. The father returned to the UK and mother and son remained in Spain. The child travelled to the UK to see the father, but when the mother returned to collect him and travel home to Spain, the father made a without notice application for prohibited steps and residence orders. The mother issued Hague Convention proceedings for the child's return to Spain. The father's applications were stayed.

Issue as to where the child was habitually resident at time of retention.  The child and family reporter were unable to elicit child's views (6 years old). Habitual residence of parents and child must have been the same at the relevant period.

They had been habitually resident in UK, especially so after it was agreed they would remain for an extended period of the father's employment. They moved for settled purposes, as part of regular order of lives, for time being, more than merely temporary. The father had not agreed to the child returning to Spanish school and nothing had been resolved as to their living arrangements. Nothing had occurred to displace habitual residence of family in UK . Hague proceedings dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from