The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
ABDUCTION/ HABITUAL RESIDENCE: FVS v MGS  EWHC 3139 (Fam)
Sep 29, 2018, 19:16 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Dec 13, 2011, 13:28 PM
Article ID :97497
(Family Division; Holman J; 18 November 2011)
The Spanish parents lived together for 18 years, had one child and were not married. The parents moved to UK for a fixed period for the father's employment. There was a chance to increase the period and the father was keen but the mother wished to return to Spain but agreed to remain in UK as the child was enrolled at school. The parents had major a argument prior to travelling to Spain for a holiday. The father returned to the UK and mother and son remained in Spain. The child travelled to the UK to see the father, but when the mother returned to collect him and travel home to Spain, the father made a without notice application for prohibited steps and residence orders. The mother issued Hague Convention proceedings for the child's return to Spain. The father's applications were stayed.
Issue as to where the child was habitually resident at time of retention. The child and family reporter were unable to elicit child's views (6 years old). Habitual residence of parents and child must have been the same at the relevant period.
They had been habitually resident in UK, especially so after it was agreed they would remain for an extended period of the father's employment. They moved for settled purposes, as part of regular order of lives, for time being, more than merely temporary. The father had not agreed to the child returning to Spanish school and nothing had been resolved as to their living arrangements. Nothing had occurred to displace habitual residence of family in UK . Hague proceedings dismissed.