Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION/ HABITUAL RESIDENCE: FVS v MGS [2011] EWHC 3139 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:16 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC3139
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2011, 13:28 PM
Article ID : 97497

(Family Division; Holman J; 18 November 2011)

The Spanish parents lived together for 18 years, had one child and were not married. The parents moved to UK for a fixed period for the father's employment. There was a chance to increase the period and the father was keen but the mother wished to return to Spain but agreed to remain in UK as the child was enrolled at school. The parents had major a argument prior to travelling to Spain for a holiday. The father returned to the UK and mother and son remained in Spain. The child travelled to the UK to see the father, but when the mother returned to collect him and travel home to Spain, the father made a without notice application for prohibited steps and residence orders. The mother issued Hague Convention proceedings for the child's return to Spain. The father's applications were stayed.

Issue as to where the child was habitually resident at time of retention.  The child and family reporter were unable to elicit child's views (6 years old). Habitual residence of parents and child must have been the same at the relevant period.

They had been habitually resident in UK, especially so after it was agreed they would remain for an extended period of the father's employment. They moved for settled purposes, as part of regular order of lives, for time being, more than merely temporary. The father had not agreed to the child returning to Spanish school and nothing had been resolved as to their living arrangements. Nothing had occurred to displace habitual residence of family in UK . Hague proceedings dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from