Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL ORDERS: R v R [2011] EWHC 3093 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:21 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC3093
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 11, 2012, 12:30 PM
Article ID : 97641

(Family Division; Coleridge J; 5 April 2011)

The couple was married for seven years and had one child. Their total assets amounted to £4 million, almost all of which had been brought into the marriage by the husband. The husband had considerable earned income. Use of White v White etc authorities not helpful in a case in which barely enough to cover needs. The case was driven mostly by needs. In such cases, counsel should not waste time in preliminary theoretical discussions, but move swiftly to look at practicalities of suggested outcomes. Disclosure: Husbands needed to understand that advisors of wives could not provide proper advice without full confidence in Form E numbers. However, the wife's injunction to prevent disposal of a numberplate had gone too far. Court would discourage pursuit of add-back approach to legal costs, which inevitably led to quasi-taxation or assessment of costs during hearing but without court having all material available to a costs judge - also led to debates about costs which new rules designed to try to reduce or prevent.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from