Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

ANCILLARY RELIEF: Livock v Livock [2011] EWHC 3040 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:16 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC3040
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 9, 2011, 13:33 PM
Article ID : 97501

(Family Division; Coleridge J; 29 November 2011) 

 The wife was awarded £600,000 following divorce. The husband applied for leave to appeal. The husband had long running outstanding tax liability dispute with Inland Revenue. The judge had found not immediate liabilities so not significant overall to scale of case.  Prior to the Court of Appeal hearing, the husband filed evidence to suggest tax liabilities more current than previously thought and HMRC becoming more active in their pursuit.  The Court of Appeal found evidence of some significance and directed a rehearing in light of the new evidence.

Little had changed in parties circumstances. Formal assessments of husband's tax liabilities had been issued but merely part of HMRC machinery to prevent claims being time-barred. It was likely that the dispute will continue for a number of years.  No immediate liabilities impacting on the wife's award.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from