Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROVISION: Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900

Sep 29, 2018, 17:47 PM
Slug : 2011EWCACiv900
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 15, 2011, 11:33 AM
Article ID : 95467

(Court of Appeal; Pill, Jackson and Gross LJJ; 29 July 2011)

The wife came to England from Pakistan to marry. She was married for 22 years. The wife was 61 when her husband died. The wife was now seeking reasonable financial provision from the estate of the deceased husband. The will left the wife £8,000 and the right to occupy the former matrimonial home rent free but subject to various conditions (therefore precarious). The conditions included the wife's obligation to repair and insure. The remainder of the estate was going to a son by a previous marriage.       

The memorandum of wishes recorded the husband's view that wife ‘has not been a loving and caring wife' and accused her of abusing him. The judge awarded the wife a unconditional right to occupy the home for life on the basis that the deceased's son would pay half of the insurance and structural repairs (estimated cost over £30,000) plus a one-half beneficial interest in the property, plus the whole of the residuary estate (about £28,000) . At issue was whether this was more than reasonable provision. The son's appeal was based on the argument that the widow had no need to have half-share in the property as well as right to occupy for life. She could/would leave this interest to her own relatives.

Appeal dismissed. The relatively small size of the estate was the governing reality. The wife was entitled to ‘capital cushion'. Long marriage so matrimonial home was significant. Granting the wife a beneficial interest was necessary to make a clean break possible.  

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from