Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROVISION: Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900

Sep 29, 2018, 17:47 PM
Slug : 2011EWCACiv900
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 15, 2011, 11:33 AM
Article ID : 95467

(Court of Appeal; Pill, Jackson and Gross LJJ; 29 July 2011)

The wife came to England from Pakistan to marry. She was married for 22 years. The wife was 61 when her husband died. The wife was now seeking reasonable financial provision from the estate of the deceased husband. The will left the wife £8,000 and the right to occupy the former matrimonial home rent free but subject to various conditions (therefore precarious). The conditions included the wife's obligation to repair and insure. The remainder of the estate was going to a son by a previous marriage.       

The memorandum of wishes recorded the husband's view that wife ‘has not been a loving and caring wife' and accused her of abusing him. The judge awarded the wife a unconditional right to occupy the home for life on the basis that the deceased's son would pay half of the insurance and structural repairs (estimated cost over £30,000) plus a one-half beneficial interest in the property, plus the whole of the residuary estate (about £28,000) . At issue was whether this was more than reasonable provision. The son's appeal was based on the argument that the widow had no need to have half-share in the property as well as right to occupy for life. She could/would leave this interest to her own relatives.

Appeal dismissed. The relatively small size of the estate was the governing reality. The wife was entitled to ‘capital cushion'. Long marriage so matrimonial home was significant. Granting the wife a beneficial interest was necessary to make a clean break possible.  

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from