Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

JURISDICTION/WARDSHIP: H v H (Jurisdiction to Grant Wardship) [2011] EWCA Civ 796

Sep 29, 2018, 17:47 PM
Slug : 2011EWCACiv796
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 4, 2011, 12:17 PM
Article ID : 95439

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Black LJJ and Sir Henry Brooke; 8 July 2011)

The father was a British citizen of Afghan origin and the mother was Afghani. The mother and father married in Afghanistan, mother first came to Britain after the birth of her child who remained in Afghanistan in the care of the uncle.  After a few years the mother left the father alleging domestic violence. Shortly afterwards the child was allegedly ‘abducted' from the uncle's home and the whereabouts was not known to the court. The mother claimed the father was concealing the whereabouts of the child. The mother issued wardship proceeding. The judge clearly believed the father was concealing the whereabouts of the child and ordered him to bring the child into jurisdiction. The father challenged the jurisdiction of the court even though he claimed that he wanted the child to live in England if he could be found. The judge considered that the child was habitually resident in England, given his parents' habitual residence, and that the court therefore had jurisdiction. Orders were made against the father with penal notices attached.

Appeal allowed. No jurisdiction over the child who was never habitually resident in jurisdiction or present. Wardship discharged.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from