Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
View all articles
Authors

VULNERABLE ADULT/ PUBLICITY: P v Independent Print Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 756

Sep 29, 2018, 17:47 PM
Slug : 2011EWCACiv756
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 17, 2011, 10:41 AM
Article ID : 95463

(Court of Appeal; Ward, Carnwath and Tomlinson LJJ; 4 July 2011)

A media application to attend court of protection hearing. The child had severe epilepsy and was born into a severely dysfunctional family. After 11 foster placements, the child was placed with a carer at the age of 6. The carer adopted him after two years. There were persistent disputes between the carer, mother and medical professionals as to his condition and treatment. The carer mother withdrew all epilepsy medication and the now adult was admitted in emergency to hospital because of fits. Following this incident, proceedings began in the Court of Protection. The key issue whether the carer mother or authority should assume care of the adult.

The adult lacked capacity in relation to the litigation but expressed a strong desire to live with the carer mother. The adult was to attempt independent living, partly because he would have to do so eventually when carer mother died, but also because of the fear that he would revert to a pre-hospitalisation state. Contact with the carer mother was to continue, although with some limitations.

Regarding the issues as to whether the media should be permitted to attend the review hearing, the media failed to give any notice of application but the judge nonetheless permitted media attendance and reports of his judgments in both permission and substantive matters, with restrictions on identification of adult.  

Appeal dismissed. The judge was entitled to hear media application and took a sensible and pragmatic course. The court was not to give guidance as to how applications to be managed or whether there was a public interest in workings of the Court of Protection and removal of an adult from the carer mother's care was a good reason for making order.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from