Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL ORDER: K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550

Sep 29, 2018, 18:32 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA550
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 7, 2011, 06:25 AM
Article ID : 95253

(Court of Appeal; Laws, Jacob and Wilson LJJ; 13 May 2011)

The wife was very wealthy (c £58.8m gross by date of trial; c £28.3m at date of separation) by virtue of pre-marriage inheritances. Nonetheless she lived extremely modestly throughout her 21 years of marriage. Recently the family was spending about £79,000 per annum.

Held that where the assets were entirely non-matrimonial and neither party had worked, the award to the husband of 9.3% of the assets (£5.3m) was not unacceptably discriminatory. The importance of the source of the assets may diminish over time depending on the circumstances, but here the assets had always been ring-fenced. ‘Special contribution' is a term of art which does not apply to a contribution of non-matrimonial property. The husband's appeal was dismissed. The judgment would be anonymised to protect the normality of the children's lives.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from