Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

VULNERABLE ADULT/LOCAL AUTHORITY: Buckinghamshire County Council v Kingston upon Thames Royal Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 457

Sep 29, 2018, 18:24 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA457
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 16, 2011, 10:15 AM
Article ID : 95033

(Court of Appeal; Pill, Patten and Munby LJJ; 19 April 2011) 

An adult with epilepsy and learning difficulties arrived from Uganda as child and the first local authority placed her in a home run by National Society for Epilepsy (NSE) within the area of the second authority.  The first authority continued to pay for this under deeming provision, which provided that she was ‘ordinarily resident' in first local authority immediately before residential accommodation provided. In an annual review the adult expressed a wish to move into supported living with friends and a bungalow nearby was identified as suitable, and she duly moved there. The first local authority sought to transfer responsibility for community care services to the second local authority but the second local authority argued the decision to move her was unlawful because the first authority had failed to consult them. Judge ruled move had been lawful, in that the first authority had no duty to act fairly towards second authority.

Appeal dismissed. There was no legal basis upon which a duty of fairness as between authorities could be identified when exercising powers in performance of a duty to a vulnerable adult. Court could not create such a duty.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from