Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

VULNERABLE ADULT/LOCAL AUTHORITY: Buckinghamshire County Council v Kingston upon Thames Royal Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 457

Sep 29, 2018, 18:24 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA457
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 16, 2011, 10:15 AM
Article ID : 95033

(Court of Appeal; Pill, Patten and Munby LJJ; 19 April 2011) 

An adult with epilepsy and learning difficulties arrived from Uganda as child and the first local authority placed her in a home run by National Society for Epilepsy (NSE) within the area of the second authority.  The first authority continued to pay for this under deeming provision, which provided that she was ‘ordinarily resident' in first local authority immediately before residential accommodation provided. In an annual review the adult expressed a wish to move into supported living with friends and a bungalow nearby was identified as suitable, and she duly moved there. The first local authority sought to transfer responsibility for community care services to the second local authority but the second local authority argued the decision to move her was unlawful because the first authority had failed to consult them. Judge ruled move had been lawful, in that the first authority had no duty to act fairly towards second authority.

Appeal dismissed. There was no legal basis upon which a duty of fairness as between authorities could be identified when exercising powers in performance of a duty to a vulnerable adult. Court could not create such a duty.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from