The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
CARE: Re D (A Child: Care Order)  EWCA Civ 34
Sep 29, 2018, 17:41 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Feb 24, 2011, 09:48 AM
Article ID :93689
(Court of Appeal; Rix, Wilson and Stanley Burnton LJJ; 26 January 2011)
The father has been convicted of four serious offences involving indecent photographs of a child and attempting to procure an underage girl for sex. The father had served a prison sentence and underwent treatment. Expert reports said he had made significant progress but he remained on the sex offenders register. The mother subsequently discovered she was pregnant.
As there was expert evidence that the father posed a low risk to his own daughter and that with further work it might be possible for the family to live together, the judge had been wrong to make a full care order at the stage that she did. She had proceeded by reference to a level of risk that was unsupported by expert evidence and refused further expert assistance that could have been obtained without significant detriment to the child. In the context of both Art 8 and Children Act 1989, s 1, her decision had to be one of last resort.
Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.
They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.