Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles

NEGLIGENCE/ CHILD PROTECTION: Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3

Sep 29, 2018, 18:04 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA3
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2011, 13:08 PM
Article ID : 93811

(Court of Appeal; President of the QBD, Leveson and Toulson LJJ; 12 January 2011)

The teacher applied for an Enhanced Criminal Record Certificate (ECRC). The police included details of an assault even though the case had been closed on the basis that the teacher was not responsible for the crime. At issue was whether the police owed the teacher a duty of care when providing information to Criminal Record Bureau and whether any such duty was breached.

The Court of Appeal rejected that there was such a duty of care in ECRC cases. The imposition of a duty of care towards persons who apply for an ECRC would give rise to a potential conflict with the statutory purpose of protecting vulnerable young people. It is important that the police should not be inhibited by the possibility of proceedings for breach of a conflicting statutory duty of care owed to those who apply for a ECRC.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from