The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
NEGLIGENCE/ CHILD PROTECTION: Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police  EWCA Civ 3
Sep 29, 2018, 18:04 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Mar 14, 2011, 13:08 PM
Article ID :93811
(Court of Appeal; President of the QBD, Leveson and Toulson LJJ; 12 January 2011)
The teacher applied for an Enhanced Criminal Record Certificate (ECRC). The police included details of an assault even though the case had been closed on the basis that the teacher was not responsible for the crime. At issue was whether the police owed the teacher a duty of care when providing information to Criminal Record Bureau and whether any such duty was breached.
The Court of Appeal rejected that there was such a duty of care in ECRC cases. The imposition of a duty of care towards persons who apply for an ECRC would give rise to a potential conflict with the statutory purpose of protecting vulnerable young people. It is important that the police should not be inhibited by the possibility of proceedings for breach of a conflicting statutory duty of care owed to those who apply for a ECRC.