Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
View all articles

NEGLIGENCE/ CHILD PROTECTION: Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3

Sep 29, 2018, 18:04 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA3
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2011, 13:08 PM
Article ID : 93811

(Court of Appeal; President of the QBD, Leveson and Toulson LJJ; 12 January 2011)

The teacher applied for an Enhanced Criminal Record Certificate (ECRC). The police included details of an assault even though the case had been closed on the basis that the teacher was not responsible for the crime. At issue was whether the police owed the teacher a duty of care when providing information to Criminal Record Bureau and whether any such duty was breached.

The Court of Appeal rejected that there was such a duty of care in ECRC cases. The imposition of a duty of care towards persons who apply for an ECRC would give rise to a potential conflict with the statutory purpose of protecting vulnerable young people. It is important that the police should not be inhibited by the possibility of proceedings for breach of a conflicting statutory duty of care owed to those who apply for a ECRC.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from