Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: AVS (by his litigation friend CS) v NHS Foundation Trust and B PCT

Sep 29, 2018, 18:04 PM
Slug : 2011AVSvNHS
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2011, 13:30 PM
Article ID : 93813

(Court of Appeal; Ward, Patten and Black LJJ; 17 January 2011)

A 57 year old patient with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease lacked capacity. No medical practitioner was ready, willing and able to provide experimental treatment that the patient's next friend (his brother, a solicitor) considered should be given. The patient had expressed a clear wish that his life be prolonged as long as possible.  The brother organised for the experimental treatment to be given, however, although initially successful, the patient's condition deteriorated to the point where the patient was in or near a vegetative state.

In AVS v A NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWHC 2746 (COP) the judge gave the brother 14 days to obtain a clinical opinion that that the medical treatment in question would be in the patient's best interests, or proceedings would be dismissed. The brother appealed. Application for permission to appeal refused.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from