Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: AVS (by his litigation friend CS) v NHS Foundation Trust and B PCT

Sep 29, 2018, 18:04 PM
Slug : 2011AVSvNHS
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2011, 13:30 PM
Article ID : 93813

(Court of Appeal; Ward, Patten and Black LJJ; 17 January 2011)

A 57 year old patient with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease lacked capacity. No medical practitioner was ready, willing and able to provide experimental treatment that the patient's next friend (his brother, a solicitor) considered should be given. The patient had expressed a clear wish that his life be prolonged as long as possible.  The brother organised for the experimental treatment to be given, however, although initially successful, the patient's condition deteriorated to the point where the patient was in or near a vegetative state.

In AVS v A NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWHC 2746 (COP) the judge gave the brother 14 days to obtain a clinical opinion that that the medical treatment in question would be in the patient's best interests, or proceedings would be dismissed. The brother appealed. Application for permission to appeal refused.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from