The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
DIVORCE/ JURISDICTION: Olafisoye v Olafisoye  EWHC 3539 (Fam) and  EWHC 3540 (Fam)
Sep 29, 2018, 18:03 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Mar 3, 2011, 08:20 AM
Article ID :93711
(Family Division; Holman J; 19 February 2010 and 28 July 2010)
The parties were married in Nigeria. The husband was neither domiciled nor habitually resident in England, however the wife was born in Scotland of Nigerian parents and settled in England (which had become their domicile of choice). The wife's domicile of origin was therefore England. While she was still a minor her father reverted to his original domicile in Nigeria so wife's domicile of dependence became Nigeria. At issue was the jurisdiction of the English court to entertain divorce proceedings brought by the wife in 2005 and the recognition of a Nigerian judgment purporting to grant a divorce.
The English court had jurisdiction to hear the wife's application. Recognition of the Nigerian divorce would be refused on the basis that the husband had not taken or caused to be taken such steps as should reasonably have been taken to give notice of the Nigerian proceedings to the wife. Although the court should be slow to exercise its discretion under Family Law Act 1986 S51(3)(a), on the facts of this case it was appropriate to do so.