Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: A Local Authority v A (No 1) and A Local Authority v A (No 2) [2010] EWHC 28 (Fam) and [2011] EWHC 590 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:15 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC28
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 5, 2011, 06:20 AM
Article ID : 94725

(Family Division; Ryder J; 28 January 2010 and 15 March 2011)

The parents were in an abusive relationship in which the father physically harmed the mother. A fact-finding hearing found that the mother had intended to, and did, smother her own child while in public ward, although she did not intend to kill the child. The resultant brain damage left the child severely disabled.

The father's relationship with the child was very important and must be promoted. The same was true of the paternal grandparents. On balance the judge considered the maternal grandparents would be able to work with the professionals and others and realised that conflict would cause the child significant harm.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from