Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave To Apply To Discharge) [2021] EWCA Civ 442
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Peter Jackson, Baker, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 26 March 2021)Public Law Children – Special guardianship – Leave to apply to discharge SGO – Refusal...
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam)
(Family Division, Lieven J, 26 March 2021)Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in Bell – Whether parents could...
Re H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), President, King, Holroyde LJJ, 30 March 2021)Private law children - Domestic Abuse – Fact finding – ApproachThe Court of Appeal provided guidance in four...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Violence Against Women and Girls Call for Evidence reopened
The government is seeking views to help inform the development of the next Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy. They are particularly keen to hear from people who may feel...
View all articles

LOCAL AUTHORITY: A Local Authority v DL, RL and ML [2010] EWHC 2675 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:35 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC2675
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 5, 2010, 09:32 AM
Article ID : 92623

(Family Division; Sir Nicholas Wall P; 25 October 2010)

The local authority made an ex parte application in respect of an elderly couple with capacity and who were being threatened by their son in his fifties who lived with them. There had been a history of physical assault and the son was attempting to coerce his father into transferring their property into his name, and trying to coerce the mother into moving into a care home.

The local authority sought protection for the elderly couple, without using criminal law. The local authority took the view that it was under a duty to protect the couple. The issue was whether the court had jurisdiction to make protective orders.  

The court ordered the Official Solicitor to carry out a Harbin v Masterman enquiry to ensure proceedings were being brought for the couple's true benefit. Re SA [2006] 1 FLR 867 provided jurisdictional basis for the exercise of inherent jurisdiction on the facts , although it could be distinguished in some respects. Alternatively, the Local Government Act 1972, s 22 could found jurisdiction for the type of injunctive relief being claimed, but did not add to the inherent jurisdiction. The court held that it had inherent jurisdiction to make a non-molestation injunction seeking only to restrain the son from acting unlawfully and therefore not prejudicing his rights in any way.


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from