Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

VULNERABLE ADULT/ CAPACITY: LBL v RYJ and VJ [2010] EWHC 2665 COP

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC2665
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 15, 2010, 04:30 AM
Article ID : 93267

(Court of Protection; Macur J; 22 September 2010)

The vulnerable adult had epilepsy due to a brain injury at birth and had significant learning difficulties. She had rejected her mother to some extent, preferring to live with her aunt or in local authority accommodation. She lacked the capacity to litigate. The local authority sought a decision as to whether she lacked capacity to make day-to-day decisions concerning daily life. The mother argued that in the main she lacked capacity. If she had capacity to make such decisions, the authority sought to invoke inherent jurisdiction and asked the court to make a ‘best interests' declaration. The Official Solicitor argued that the use of inherent jurisdiction would subvert statutory scheme.

Inherent jurisdiction was available to supplement protection offered by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 but could not be used in cases of adults with capacity to impose a decision upon him/her as to welfare or finance. It was not established that this woman lacked capacity or that she was unable to recognise and withstand external pressure, or that she was likely to be subjected to physical constraint or behaviour impacting on her free will.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from