The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
(Family Division; Sir Nicholas Wall P; 25 October 2010)
The first risk assessment by a Cafcass officer identified some serious risks from police information. The Cafcass officer's manager decided the first report should not be sent to court, explaining that this was because of ‘quality assurance issues'. The manager sent the case to another officer who amended the report and filed it. The judge, who was aware that this report was not the original, was concerned that Cafcass was withholding information from the court. The judge ordered disclosure of the original report.
In fact the original report had never been filed, and was not being relied on because it did not meet the terms of the disclosure protocol, not because of quality assurance issues. Under the protocol, Cafcass was not permitted to refer in reports to police information not relevant to the child or to give copy of original information to the parties or their legal representatives. Cafcass apologised for failing to make true position clear to judge.
Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.
They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.