Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROCEEDINGS: G v B [2010] EWHC 2630 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:35 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC2630
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 10, 2010, 20:19 PM
Article ID : 92635

(Family Division; Sir Nicholas Wall P; 25 October 2010)

The first risk assessment by a Cafcass officer identified some serious risks from police information. The Cafcass officer's manager decided the first report should not be sent to court, explaining that this was because of ‘quality assurance issues'. The manager sent the case to another officer who amended the report and filed it. The judge, who was aware that this report was not the original, was concerned that Cafcass was withholding information from the court. The judge ordered disclosure of the original report.

In fact the original report had never been filed, and was not being relied on because it did not meet the terms of the disclosure protocol, not because of quality assurance issues.  Under the protocol, Cafcass was not permitted to refer in reports to police information not relevant to the child or to give copy of original information to the parties or their legal representatives. Cafcass apologised for failing to make true position clear to judge.  

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from