Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

PROPERTY: Ashby v Kilduff [2010] EWHC 2034 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC2034
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 22, 2010, 09:55 AM
Article ID : 91431

(Chancery Division; Bernard Livesey QC sitting as a deputy judge of the HC; 30 July 2010)

A cohabiting same-sex couple (one an MP, the other a doctor) each bought a flat in the same building. The couple then renovated flats to create single living space with two separate titles.

After the MP lost libel proceedings in respect of his relationship with the doctor, he transferred his flat to the doctor to ensure it did not have to be sold. When relationship ended some years later, the MP claimed the doctor held the property by way of a constructive/resulting trust for him. The doctor argued that the MP sold him the whole of his legal and beneficial interest in the property.

Held that the property was held by the MP and the doctor as legal and beneficial joint tenants: that the property was held subject to a trust that the MP was responsible for all outgoings and entitled to the income from the property during his lifetime. The doctor  was entitled to sever the beneficial joint tenancy and he did so in June 2009, the effect of this was they held the legal interest in the property as legal joint tenants but the beneficial interest as tenants in common but subject to the same trust as before, which will not have been affected by the Notice of Severance.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from