Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE/ JURISDICTION: W v W (Divorce Proceedings) [2010] EWHC 1843 (fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:30 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC1843
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 13, 2010, 06:30 AM
Article ID : 91291

(Family Division; Holman J; 15 July 2010)

The couple were Swedish nationals and were habitually resident in England for the last 15 years. The wife lodged the relevant divorce documents with the English court before the husband lodged the relevant divorce documents with the Swedish court. However, when the wife twice tried to serve the husband with the documents, on both occasions it was a Sunday. Although she then served on a weekday, by then the husband had served the Swedish proceedings.  

Editors of Rayden were correct and under current Family Proceeding Rules divorce petitions should not be served on a Sunday. However, there was no sanction provided in the rules.

Held that English court undoubtedly seised first. Service on a Sunday did not null and void service, but done in good faith, it was merely an irregularity. No prejudice or religious offence suggested and the court declined to exercise jurisdiction to set aside proceedings. The international context and jurisdictional issues did not affect this decision. No doubt that the English proceedings were issued first and as matter of fact the English documents were served first, albeit in manner that breached a technical rule.  

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from