Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE/ JURISDICTION: W v W (Divorce Proceedings) [2010] EWHC 1843 (fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:30 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC1843
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 13, 2010, 06:30 AM
Article ID : 91291

(Family Division; Holman J; 15 July 2010)

The couple were Swedish nationals and were habitually resident in England for the last 15 years. The wife lodged the relevant divorce documents with the English court before the husband lodged the relevant divorce documents with the Swedish court. However, when the wife twice tried to serve the husband with the documents, on both occasions it was a Sunday. Although she then served on a weekday, by then the husband had served the Swedish proceedings.  

Editors of Rayden were correct and under current Family Proceeding Rules divorce petitions should not be served on a Sunday. However, there was no sanction provided in the rules.

Held that English court undoubtedly seised first. Service on a Sunday did not null and void service, but done in good faith, it was merely an irregularity. No prejudice or religious offence suggested and the court declined to exercise jurisdiction to set aside proceedings. The international context and jurisdictional issues did not affect this decision. No doubt that the English proceedings were issued first and as matter of fact the English documents were served first, albeit in manner that breached a technical rule.  

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from