Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles


Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : 2010EWCA1118
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2010, 04:30 AM
Article ID : 93263

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Smith and Patten LJJ; 23 September 2010)

The guardian raised the possibility that the children were exposed to domestic violence and supported the mother's version of events rather than taking a neutral stance. The recorder rejected the evidence of the father and found domestic violence, describing the guardian's submissions as key. Subsequently the guardian's counsel discovered that the guardian had instructed the recorder in a different case which was still ongoing. An application was made for the recorder to recuse herself. The recorder did so, but refused to set aside her the earlier findings.

The father's appeal was allowed. Whatever the reasons the recorder had for recusing herself, it must be based on the possibility that an objective bystander might question her impartiality. Logically taint must exist in respect of past conduct. Judges should err on the side of caution and reveal anything that might provoke an application to recuse. The judge had not given full details of the relationship or properly applied the informed bystander test. Each case will be fact dependent, but the currency of the relationship and the fact that the guardian had not taken a neutral stance on the fact find were relevant.  


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from