Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles


Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : 2010EWCA1118
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2010, 04:30 AM
Article ID : 93263

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Smith and Patten LJJ; 23 September 2010)

The guardian raised the possibility that the children were exposed to domestic violence and supported the mother's version of events rather than taking a neutral stance. The recorder rejected the evidence of the father and found domestic violence, describing the guardian's submissions as key. Subsequently the guardian's counsel discovered that the guardian had instructed the recorder in a different case which was still ongoing. An application was made for the recorder to recuse herself. The recorder did so, but refused to set aside her the earlier findings.

The father's appeal was allowed. Whatever the reasons the recorder had for recusing herself, it must be based on the possibility that an objective bystander might question her impartiality. Logically taint must exist in respect of past conduct. Judges should err on the side of caution and reveal anything that might provoke an application to recuse. The judge had not given full details of the relationship or properly applied the informed bystander test. Each case will be fact dependent, but the currency of the relationship and the fact that the guardian had not taken a neutral stance on the fact find were relevant.  


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from