Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

CARE: Staffordshire County Council v VW [2009] EWHC 1982 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Slug : 2009EWHC1982
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 21, 2010, 11:35 AM
Article ID : 91427

(Family Division; McFarlane J; 28 July 2009)

The local authority claimed that certain of the child's unique symptoms were the result of rough handling by the family and applied for a care order.

Two weeks into a hospital stay, x-rays revealed fractures to the ribs and legs as well as swelling in the head. The family argued that the fractures were a result of physical interventions by the medical team. Previous scans/x-rays during the hospital stay had shown no injury to the skull or ribs.

It was not necessary for court to make positive findings on possible causes of the injury, just to decide whether on balance of probability they were caused by the family.  

There was a possibility that staff had held child down in order to keep a medical tube in while the child was having a fit. The court established that the hospital records and recollection were not as good as they should have been and there was no evidence that the head swelling was caused non-accidentally.

The court made positive findings as to parents' credibility. None of the allegations relied upon by the local authority were proved. It followed that the statutory threshold criteria in Children Act 1989, s 31 was not satisfied with respect to the child and the local authority's application for a care order was dismissed.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from