Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

High Court rules council failed to protect man from abusive parents

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Slug : 17-12-2007-high-court-rules-council-failed-to-protect-man-from-abusive-parents
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 17, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89513

A man who was abused by his parents until the age of 14, has successfully sued Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council in the High Court in London for neglect and been awarded £25,000 in damages.

The council was refused leave to appeal the ruling although their barrister, Catherine Foster, said they intended to petition the Court of Appeal directly.

In the landmark case on Thursday, Jake Pierce, 31, described to the court how he was subjected to continuous beatings by his parents until he left home at 14 to live on the streets after his father threatened to kill him. In July 1976 Mr Pierce had been placed in foster care after he had been admitted to hospital when he was six months old. However in November 1977 the council returned him to his parents where the abuse continued. After suffering severe scalding to his body in 1979 he was placed on the 'at risk' register but, against the advice of doctors, he was again returned home.

Mr Justice Eady found that Mr Pierce had suffered "indifference, neglect and periodic violence at the hands of his parents" which amounted to "physical cruelty and emotional deprivation" and had he been put into care by the council in November 1977 he would have been "properly looked after".

The council, which now faces high legal costs, was ordered to immediately pay £40,000 towards Mr Pierce's costs.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from