Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

High Court rules council failed to protect man from abusive parents

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Slug : 17-12-2007-high-court-rules-council-failed-to-protect-man-from-abusive-parents
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 17, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89513

A man who was abused by his parents until the age of 14, has successfully sued Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council in the High Court in London for neglect and been awarded £25,000 in damages.

The council was refused leave to appeal the ruling although their barrister, Catherine Foster, said they intended to petition the Court of Appeal directly.

In the landmark case on Thursday, Jake Pierce, 31, described to the court how he was subjected to continuous beatings by his parents until he left home at 14 to live on the streets after his father threatened to kill him. In July 1976 Mr Pierce had been placed in foster care after he had been admitted to hospital when he was six months old. However in November 1977 the council returned him to his parents where the abuse continued. After suffering severe scalding to his body in 1979 he was placed on the 'at risk' register but, against the advice of doctors, he was again returned home.

Mr Justice Eady found that Mr Pierce had suffered "indifference, neglect and periodic violence at the hands of his parents" which amounted to "physical cruelty and emotional deprivation" and had he been put into care by the council in November 1977 he would have been "properly looked after".

The council, which now faces high legal costs, was ordered to immediately pay £40,000 towards Mr Pierce's costs.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from