Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

High Court rules council failed to protect man from abusive parents

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Title : High Court rules council failed to protect man from abusive parents
Slug : 17-12-2007-high-court-rules-council-failed-to-protect-man-from-abusive-parents
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Dec 17, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89513

A man who was abused by his parents until the age of 14, has successfully sued Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council in the High Court in London for neglect and been awarded £25,000 in damages.

The council was refused leave to appeal the ruling although their barrister, Catherine Foster, said they intended to petition the Court of Appeal directly.

In the landmark case on Thursday, Jake Pierce, 31, described to the court how he was subjected to continuous beatings by his parents until he left home at 14 to live on the streets after his father threatened to kill him. In July 1976 Mr Pierce had been placed in foster care after he had been admitted to hospital when he was six months old. However in November 1977 the council returned him to his parents where the abuse continued. After suffering severe scalding to his body in 1979 he was placed on the 'at risk' register but, against the advice of doctors, he was again returned home.

Mr Justice Eady found that Mr Pierce had suffered "indifference, neglect and periodic violence at the hands of his parents" which amounted to "physical cruelty and emotional deprivation" and had he been put into care by the council in November 1977 he would have been "properly looked after".

The council, which now faces high legal costs, was ordered to immediately pay £40,000 towards Mr Pierce's costs.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from