Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

January LSC payments

Sep 29, 2018, 17:45 PM
Slug : 07-01-2008-january-lsc-payments
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 7, 2008, 08:44 AM
Article ID : 90381

Mike Crowley, the Director of Contracting for the Legal Services Commission, wrote to all providers last Thursday outlining how the LSC calculated providers January payments.

Following their decision in November to close the LSC Online system, the LSC has processed providers' claims via a bulk-load spreadsheet, or in some exceptional circumstances, via paper submission. Many of these claims have been rejected primarily because providers are entering the wrong codes on their claim forms. In his letter, Mr Crowley urges providers to make sure they use the correct codes on their claims to ensure they are processed correctly.

Due the very high error and rejection rate on the submissions, the value of the claims made in October and November are in the main much lower than expected. The LSC has therefore decided to calculate January's Standard Monthly Payment (SMP) for all providers using claim data up to and including September 07's submissions and using the lowest average claim rate over the past 3, 6 or 12 months to project what SMP is required for January. This SMP has then been reviewed by the provider's Account Manager to ensure it reflects any agreements about the January SMP that may have been made over the previous month.

In his letter, Mike Crowley asks providers who receive a payment in January that is significantly lower than they would have expected, to contact their Account Manager. If it is agreed that they should have received a higher SMP the Account Manager can authorise an ad-hoc payment that will be paid via the next payment run.

More information, including a copy of Mike Crowley's letter, can be found on the LSC website:

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from