Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Family Justice Council responds to Court Service budget crisis

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Title : Family Justice Council responds to Court Service budget crisis
Slug : 05-09-2008-family-justice-council-responds-to-court-service-budget-crisis
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 5, 2008, 12:15 PM
Article ID : 89425

The Family Justice Council has responded to the letter published yesterday from Lord Justice Leveson, warning of a £90 million shortfall in the budget for the justice system, as reported in Newswatch yesterday.

Family Justice Council member and District Judge Nick Crichton said: "The Family Justice Council has previously highlighted its concerns about the increase in court fees, as have others, and it welcomes Lord Justice Leveson's letter for bringing the issue to wider attention.

"The Council believes that the substantial increase in fees for public family law cases, which came into effect on 1st May, is the wrong way to finance the family courts, especially with regards to care proceedings.

"We are concerned that children experiencing chronic neglect may have to wait longer before action is taken. Substantial court fees can act as a disincentive for local authorities to take care proceedings in a timely manner and will increase the incidence of cases where action is taken too slowly.

"Our view is that care proceedings should be exempt from the policy of full cost recovery. Local authorities initiate these proceedings for the protection of children as part of their public and statutory duties."

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from