Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles

'Lying around the kitchen' - Imerman 9 years on

Oct 11, 2019, 15:44 PM
This article considers the nature of those obligations as they have been developed through subsequent decisions.
Slug :
Meta Title : 'Lying around the kitchen' - Imerman 9 years on
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 9, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Nicholas Allen QC, 29 Bedford Row

The decision in Tchenguiz-Imerman v Imerman [2010] 2 FLR 814, CA catapulted the term “Imerman documents” into the everyday vocabulary of the family practitioner. It shifted the baseline and the boundaries of confidence. It changed the way in which we view, treat and advise clients in relation to the obtaining of the other spouse’s confidential documents within financial remedy proceedings. Significantly, it imposed obligations in relation to those documents on both the spouse and the practitioner.

This article considers the nature of those obligations as they have been developed through subsequent decisions. It identifies an important and understated distinction between confidential documents and the confidential information that may be derived from those documents. This information can be keenly remembered by the most determined of divorcing spouses long after the strict obligations to return the documents have been complied with. Behind the Imerman obligations may lie legitimate (if unforeseen) opportunities for a spouse to capitalise on what is remembered in financial remedy proceedings. These opportunities carry risk. But they may also carry reward. This article considers both, and concludes that, even nine years on from the decision in Imerman, much remains untested.



The full article will be published in the October issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.








Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from