17 JUL 2017

MoJ consults on plans to 'de-link' financial proceedings from divorce and dissolution proceedings

MoJ consults on plans to 'de-link' financial proceedings from divorce and dissolution proceedings

The Financial Remedies Handbook is the first resort for thousands of matrimonial lawyers by combining a clear explanation of the applicable legal principles with straightforward advice on practice and procedure.

This new edition for 2017 has been thoroughly revised and contains detailed analysis and practical guidance on all recent case-law and procedural developments.


The 11th edition is available to order here.



The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has launched a consultation on proposed amendments to Part 9 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010: Applications for a Financial Remedy.

The proposed amendments are intended to facilitate the 'de-linking' of applications for a financial order from proceedings for a decree of divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership, so that it will no longer be possible to make an application for a financial order in a divorce petition or dissolution application.
Article continues below...
Financial Remedies Handbook

Financial Remedies Handbook

Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook this is the first resort for thousands of...

More Info £85.00
Available in Family Law Online
Family Law

Family Law

journal

"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with contemporary issues" Sir Mark Potter P

More Info from £320.00
Available in Family Law Online

Additionally, the proposed amendments would also make changes to the types of financial remedy cases to which the procedure in Chapter 5 of Pt 9 of the FPR applies, rename that procedure as 'fast track' and make some minor changes to the procedure itself.

The consultation closes at 5pm on Friday 8 September 2017. 

Commenting on the consultation, family law solicitor and arbitrator Tony Roe says:

'This consultation merits very careful consideration. There are some fundamental issues in play. Accordingly it is rather unhelpful that the consultation, which seems to present matters on a rather narrow basis, has been launched by the MoJ just before the summer recess. As such the deadline, 8 September, gives precious little time for responses to be submitted.

Amongst other things, I am not comfortable with the consultation’s proposal that financial claims be removed from the petition (application for a matrimonial or civil partnership order) itself, particularly if the petitioner/applicant were to remarry without having made an application for a financial order, thereby being statute-barred from doing so. De-linking can happen without that.

Whilst the consultation refers to the fact that the President noted in his 17th View that only a minority of divorce cases give rise to a money claim, it is important for parties, particularly litigants in person, to be aware of the implications that there may be by leaving financial aspects unresolved, without a consent order dismissing potential claims. Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14 demonstrated such risks when a former wife successfully brought a claim for financial remedies some twenty years after decree absolute.

As for the proposed introduction of the term "fast-track" for even financial relief claims limited to periodical payments or lump sums of up to £25,000, there appears to be nothing mentioned of any pilot. Moreover, I would be very surprised if such a procedure would massively improve the current delays within the court system.'

Subscribe to our newsletters