Bookmark and Share

JUDICIAL REVIEW: R (ET) v Islington Borough Council

13 NOV 2012

(Queen's Bench Division, Cranston J, 30 October 2012)

The three sisters lived with their maternal grandmother. The mother had a history of substance abuse and had been in a relationship with a man who had been convicted of child sexual abuse. In 2012 he was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment for the sexual assault of a 10-year-old boy who was the son of a friend. He was also placed on the sexual offender's register for 10 years and made the subject of a sexual offences prevention order.

The local authority carried out a risk assessment which concluded that the risk posed by the man could be managed and that the only necessary addition to measures being taken would be for the grandmother to take out an injunction against the man.

The children, through their litigation friend, the grandmother, sought judicial review of that decision. The claim would be dismissed. Assessing the criminal risk posed to the children was not central to the local authority's work but was a task for the criminal justice agencies. A wide range of agencies had been consulted and a considered judgment of the risk was made. It could not be said that the authority had acted with Wednesbury unreasonableness.

Hershman & McFarlane: Children Act Handbook 2014/15

A source of key children proceedings legislation and related guidance…

from £49.50 More Info
Available in Family Law Online

Reforming Family Justice

A Guide to the Family Court and the Children and Families Act 2014

The book contains commentary on and analysis of the Children and Families Act 2014, including clear …

from £49.50 More Info