We use Cookies to deliver our online, application, and email services. Details on the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookie Policy. Either click "Agree" to our use of these cookies, or, simply continue browsing. AGREE

10 OCT 2018

IQ v JP C-478/17

IQ v JP C-478/17

(Court of Justice of the European Union, 4 October 2018)

Jurisdiction – Art 15, BIIA – Preliminary ruling – Two courts of different Member States seised of matters relating to parental responsibility – Application of Art 15

The Court of Justice of the European Union held that Art 15 of BIIA did not apply where both courts of Member States had jurisdiction under Arts 8 and 12.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law ReportsSubscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 



JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)

4 October 2018 (*)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 15 — Transfer to a court better placed to hear the case — Scope — Article 19 — Lis pendens)


In Case C 478/17,

REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Tribunalul Cluj (Regional Court, Cluj, Romania), made by decision of 17 July 2017, received at the Court on 9 August 2017, in the proceedings IQ v JP,

THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)


Judgment: IQ v JP C-478_17.rtf

Family Court Practice, The

(Red Book)

Autumn Supplement coming soon

More Info from £529.99
Available in Lexis®Library
Financial Remedies Handbook

Financial Remedies Handbook

Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook this is the first resort for thousands of...

More Info £91.99
Subscribe to our newsletters