Family

Penny Booth: Children - who is protecting what from whom now?

24 March 2010

Penny Booth

Leading doctors are calling for a ban on smoking in cars in an attempt to provide protection for children from passive smoking. This makes the The Times front page news today, plus a stern letter on the letters page inside.

The expansion of protective law like this is overdue (can't think why it wasn't brought in before) but it really does beg some questions and provide yet another law that it is going to be hard to enforce.

Oh yes, the obvious lighting-up as you get into the car to take those obese children home from school could be 'tutted' at and could be enforced, but will it mean cleaning out the car every time a fag is lit up enroute by the combustion engine method, before you can give a lift to yours or someone else's child? Goodbye to outings as they used to be. It won't be the only combustion around, in all likelihood. No doubt (and I don't doubt that it is) a good idea but one that will be hard to operate - and that really is a poor law, isn't it? We will think we are protecting children but all we will do is make smoking as attractive as all those other sinful and secret activities and as they go underground they will become more attractive for the young.

Now, compare this with another aspect of child protection this week... the Pope and the priesthood are really getting it; no, not smoking this time, but the allegations and occurrences of child abuse that find a centre round the Catholic Church. Ken MacDonald 'Call the Police: that is what the Pope should have said' (The Times, page 19 Wednesday 24 March 2010) makes a good read, outlining the result of failing to deal with a crime of disgusting proportions.

It does seem that between the two, a Church (any church?) we should be able to trust, and our parents and carers (who are supposed to protect us) we are running out of individuals and institutions to trust for child care - emphasis on the 'care'. I, for one, find the third alternative, the State, not one I feel I might always be able to trust. After all, barely a week goes by without some social worker trusting in their latest-thinking modern approach to social care and forgeting to apply refined common sense. So it seems to me, anyway. After all, the State in all its magnificence is supposed to provide appropriate laws - and isn't doing so.

Penny Booth is an Honorary Research Fellow at Liverpool University Centre for the Study of the Child, the Family and the Law. Click here to follow Penny Booth on Twitter.

Related Opinion

News
8 Apr

Opinion

Penny Booth: Househusbands?

2010-04-08 15:53:00 UTC

Househusbands?  I am all in favour. The Times yesterday reports on a ten-fold increase in the number of househusbands based on 6% of men reporting...

More Info »
News
26 Mar

Opinion

Penny Booth: Private Law Programme Practice Direction: We need more staff, not more paperwork

2010-03-26 15:39:00 UTC

Penny BoothPrincipled intentions are to be welcomed - could it be any other way? However, welcome as this direction is for the resolution of parental...

More Info »
News
22 Mar

Opinion

Penny Booth: Core - wotta lotta news!

2010-03-22 15:30:00 UTC

Core - wotta lotta news! This week in Family Law starts with issues that seem to be at the crux of matters family in the law right now. Were this...

More Info »

Related Products

Flj_index_cover

Family

Family Law

Elizabeth Walsh

News, updates and case reports covering every area of family law

£286.00

More Info »
Flr_index_cover

Family

Family Law Reports

Rebecca Bailey-Harris, Caroline Bridge, Nigel Lowe

Law reports covering cases resulting from family and children law issues

£357.00

More Info »

NEW Family Law Online

- A Snapshot

View a one minute video of the NEW Family Law Online features.

 - Video Tutorials

Get up-to-speed with how to browse and search on the NEW service.

Click 'More Info' below to view the narrated video demonstrations.

More Info »

Laptop_and_play_image