Family
Featured
Family
Family Property and Finance Conference 2012
Holiday Inn, Regent's Park, Carburton Street, W1W 5EE
Expert guidance on the hot topics and key developments in financial remedy cases.
£250.00
More Info »
Family
Access to all audioCPD for your CPD year
Online
Family Law audioCPD unlimited access for your CPD year
£99.00
More Info »
Family
Family Law journalCPD (April 2012)
Online
Gain your 3 CPD points with the April issue of the Family Law journal
£45.00
More Info »
Family Justice Review Published
03 November 2011
By Hugh Logue, Newswatch Editor
The Family Justice Review panel has today published its final report (download below) announcing a range of recommendations aimed at tackling delays and generally improving the family justice system.
Changes to public law children cases include a recommendation to introduce a new six month time limit in care cases so delays are significantly reduced. In addition the panel proposed that the family courts place less reliance on 'unnecessary' expert witnesses and reports and refocus on determining whether the child should go into care.
Law Society Chief Executive Desmond Hudson said that the Government will have to find the resources to implement the recommendations.
"To effectively halve the time which cases take now will require additional resources - more court time and more judges' time. It will also require more time from family solicitors, but that is under threat from cuts in legal aid fees and scope," Mr Hudson said.
In an effort to create a more consistent and simple court service, the review recommends more judges who are specialists in family law to hear cases from start to finish. As previously announced in the interim report, the proposals also include incorporating Cafcass into a new service where it would work jointly with the courts service, legal aid and other partner agencies within a single service.
Recommendations on private law children cases include a single online and phone help service to make it simpler for people to decide the most appropriate way forward and increase clarity of understanding. The panel also propose using Parenting Agreements and a new ‘child arrangements order' to bring together arrangements for children's care after separation, focusing on the child rather than ‘contact' and ‘residence'. As expected, the review recommends increased provision of mediation to prevent cases going to court unnecessarily.
David Norgrove, chair of the Family Justice Review, said: "Our package of recommendations to the Government and the judiciary will make the current family justice system more effective. We need to eliminate the shocking delays in the system.
"Every year 500,000 children and adults are involved in the family justice system. They turn to it at times of great stress and conflict. It must deliver the best possible outcome for all the children and families who use it, because its decisions directly affect the lives and futures of all those involved, and have repercussions for society as a whole."
The Government has welcomed the Review and has announced that from January 2012 it will publish court-by-court performance so everyone can see exactly where improvements need to be targeted. In addition it has announced that it will be increasing funding for mediation by two thirds to £25 million a year.
Fathers' rights groups have criticised the panel's decision not recommend that there should be a presumption in law of shared parenting.
Ken Sanderson, CEO of Families Need Fathers, commented: "The core failing of the current family justice system is that the rights of children to maintain meaningful relationships with both parents, as set out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, are not adequately supported or enforced. By choosing not to address this issue, any other proposals to reform the system will be merely superficial adjustments to a fundamentally broken system."
However, Tanya Roberts, partner at Charles Russell LLP believes the panel's recommendations are appropriate.
"The Family Justice review makes interesting reading but its conclusions regarding grandparents and fathers are not surprising. They are sensible and measured and emphasise the most important aspect namely that decisions about children should be based on what is in their best interests and therefore what is appropriate in each individual case depending on its facts," Ms Roberts said.
To read more about the Family Justice Review, see the collected papers of the 2011 Dartington Hall conference which include a Memo to the Norgrove Committee from the Conference.
Downloads
Related Products
Family
Dear David: A Memo to the Norgrove Committee from the Dartington Conference 2011
Rt Hon Lord Justice Thorpe, William Tyzack
The papers of the 2011 Interdisciplinary Conference at Dartington Hall
£35.00
More Info »
Family
Hershman and McFarlane: Children Law and Practice
David Hershman, Andrew McFarlane
The definitive reference work on child law, used daily in courts everywhere
£525.00
More Info »
Family
Hershman and McFarlane: Children Law and Practice Online
The definitive reference work on child law, used daily in courts everywhere
More Info »
Family
Family Court Practice Online, The
The acknowledged authority on practice and procedure in family courts
More Info »
Family
Family Law
Elizabeth Walsh
News, updates and case reports covering every area of family law
£286.00
More Info »
Family
Family Law Reports
Rebecca Bailey-Harris, Caroline Bridge, Nigel Lowe
Law reports covering cases resulting from family and children law issues
£357.00
More Info »NEW Family Law Online
- A Snapshot
View a one minute video of the NEW Family Law Online features.
- Video Tutorials
Get up-to-speed with how to browse and search on the NEW service.
Click 'More Info' below to view the narrated video demonstrations.
