A comprehensive guide to the complexities of the 1996 Convention, including detailed...
Examines the detailed legal framework including the complexities of both UK legislation...
This work seeks to restate the theory and established rules of good advocacy
Family Law audioCPD unlimited access for your CPD year
Gain your 3 CPD points with the April issue of the Family Law journal
Mikiko Otani, one of Japan's leading family lawyers, has today, 7 September, 2012, confirmed to the IAML annual conference in Singapore that Japan will not be signing the Hague child abduction Convention in the near future, at least a year as a minimum.
There had been real hopes that the Japanese parliament, the Diet, would be adopting it over the next couple of months, but Mikiko reported that the Parliament had closed, formally effective 8 September, as a general election has been called. There is no prospect now of it being adopted until the next Parliamentary year, if then. This closure of Parliament was due to party political reasons within Japan and thoroughly unrelated to child abduction issues.
The Japanese cabinet had announced as long ago as May 2011 that it was starting on the preparation of the legislation to ratify the Convention into Japanese law. A lot of work had been undertaken by Japanese Justice officials and Central Authority with child abduction lawyers and central authorities elsewhere in the world to get Japan ready for the introduction of the Hague convention. In February 2012, draft legislation was introduced into the Japanese Parliament giving the Western world real hope of implementation very soon. Alas these hopes are now dashed. It is very regrettable.
Mikiko explained that there was opposition in Japan including to The Hague Art 13b defence of "grave risk". There was a feeling amongst some in Japan that this did not go far enough and should extend to domestic violence against the child, against the abducting parent and fears of prosecution of the abducting parent on any return. The worry has been that unless these were included, or understood locally as being included within the definition of grave risk, the prospects of implementation were more limited. Others such as Mikiko had been working tirelessly to promote its introduction. This present delay in implementation of the legislation in Japan by the sudden closure of the Parliament will give more opportunity for those seeking to impose hurdles and obstacles in the way of the implementation of the Convention. Observers from abroad are anxious that if grave risk is extended or interpreted in this way, it is in effect creating a welfare test analysis instead of the expectation of an immediate return order.
It will be a matter now of examining the sentiments and commitment of the eventual new government and whether they will insist that Japan takes its place at the international family law table and commits to the child abduction international convention. Bob Arenstein, a leading US child abduction lawyer, in the same session at the conference highlighted the many difficult cases which now exist between Western countries and Japan. Since the Convention came into effect, not a single Japanese case on international parental abduction has been resolved through Japanese court ruling or enforcement. The US is taking a particularly strong line, including through motions in the U.S. Senate, on the failures of Japan to co-operate with international children laws. Japan is the only G7 country not to sign the Convention.
Family law like any other area of law reform is naturally subject to the vicissitudes of party politics and Parliamentary timetables. It is however such a great and regrettable pity that a hugely needed development in international children law has been a victim of the political process in Japan. It is much to be hoped that the political parties seeking election in Japan were all put forward a mandate of the best interests of children by an early adoption in Japan of the Hague child abduction convention.
He is an English specialist accredited solicitor, mediator, family arbitrator, Deputy District Judge at the Principal Registry of the Family Division, High Court, London and also an Australian qualified solicitor, barrister and mediator. He is a Fellow of the International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and chair of the Family Law Review Group of the Centre for Social Justice.
David is the author of a new major reference work, The International Family Law Practice as well as A Practical Guide to International Family Law (Jordan Publishing, 2008). He can be contacted on firstname.lastname@example.org.
The views expressed by contributing authors are not necessarily those of Family Law or Jordan Publishing and should not be considered as legal advice.
I had the considerable privilege of being invited this summer by the Queensland Law Society to be the international keynote speaker at their...More Info »
The Hague Conference on Private International Law has just published its long-awaited guide to good practice on mediation in child abduction...More Info »
The government consultation of 14 June 2012 has proposed an amendment to the Children Act 1989 by adding some form of presumption or principle...More Info »
It doesn't appear on most itineraries of holiday companies; morning: visit to the Dubai family courts, afternoon: at leisure, evening: trip...More Info »
The EU Maintenance Regulation is one of the most complex and bewildering pieces of legislation in English family law, having been directly imposed...More Info »
Last week, The Times (10 April) ran a front-page story headed "'Divorce tourists' take over the courts". It compiled statistics about...More Info »
El Gamal v Al Maktoum  EWHC EWHC, just reported, is another High Court decision concerning recognition of (foreign and other) marriages...More Info »
George Osborne's Budget on 21 March 2012 contains several elements which affect family lawyers doing international cases with substantial assets...More Info »
With the government launching a consultation today on how to introduce same-sex marriage into England and Wales, sidestepping the real question...More Info »
In the recent R v Kayani, R v Solliman decision  EWCA Crim 2871, the Court of Appeal has called upon the Law Commission to address the...More Info »
I am grateful to Anna Heenan of Mills & Reeves for drawing attention to another incidental and possibly accidental implication of the EU...More Info »
Newspapers at the weekend carried stories of a new service of superfast 24 hour divorces being offered to people in England. The catch: the...More Info »
This constitutes a simple plea for all international families: Don't agree any final relocation without sorting out and implementing the child...More Info »
It is a little-known fact that one can go through more than one wedding ceremony, naturally of course with the same person otherwise it would...More Info »
Click here to pre-order David Hodson's new major reference work, The International Family Law Practice. At 4 AM on Friday 9 December 2011, David...More Info »
Click here to pre-order David Hodson's new major reference work, The International Family Law Practice. Transitional provisions are invariably the...More Info »
At the weekend, 11th of November 2011, there was a historic launch in Belfast of a cross-border initiative between the family lawyers of Northern Ireland...More Info »
The Institute of Advanced Legal Studies held an informative evening presentation on 27 October on Islamic family law and practice given by Aina Khan...More Info »
As a Sotonian born and bred, of the city of Southampton, I express my huge sadness today that Cunard shipping company is no longer registered as a British...More Info »
This week's opinion piece must start with huge personal thanks to all Family Law journal and online readers who voted for me in the Jordans Family Law...More Info »
News reaches of another southern Mediterranean country, Italy, facing financial crisis with more problems for the Euro currency and with the remaining...More Info »
By dint of being let down at the last minute by one of my contributors and with the deadline for submitting to my publishers the second edition of the...More Info »
It is very easy for us to become despondent when working daily in the family courts and having to cope with administrative and other delays and difficulties...More Info »
One of the most important things when dealing with a case with an international element is never to presume the foreign law will be the same as England...More Info »
If it was going to be the coldest summer for many years, then perhaps not the worst time to spend it indoors with the Redbook! Jordans’ A Practical...More Info »
The UK has decided not to opt into the draft EU marital property regimes Regulation, published in March 2011. On 30 June 2011, the Ministry of Justice...More Info »
At the 12th Australian Family Lawyers Conference held in Singapore in June 2011 the opportunity was taken during an Ethics workshop led by Federal Magistrate...More Info »
The Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 21 May 2008 on Certain Aspects of Mediation in Civil and Commercial Matters...More Info »
Justice Quinn, a judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, has delivered a judgment which many of us with any judicial capacity would have loved...More Info »
The EU Maintenance Regulation came into force on Saturday, 18 of June 2011. Only five days earlier, Monday, 13 June, 2011, the domestic regulations...More Info »
Attached to the new FPR 2010 is a draft divorce petition, as it was to the 1991 Rules. However it will cause confusion and extra work for lawyers and...More Info »
Published today is Madeleine (Bantam Press 2011) by Kate McCann. It tells the hugely sad disappearance of Madeleine McCann four years ago and the continued...More Info »
Mr Justice Mostyn received thoroughly unfair newspaper criticism last Sunday 24 April 2011, and in a way which did no good for perceptions about family...More Info »
The IAML European Chapter has just held its annual meeting in Strasbourg. Apart from European Fellows and lawyer guests, there were many from America...More Info »
The popular media predictably relished the sound bite given to them last Thursday when judgment was handed down in Golubovich. Seizing populist condemnation...More Info »
The EU has just published its long-awaited proposals for divorce property rights in cross-border cases. It is in many regards very good, much to be...More Info »
On 6 April, 2011, England and Wales has a new procedural set of rules with ancillary practice directions and very different forms. What is striking...More Info »
What impact will the new mediation imperative in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 have in international cases? On 6 April, 2011, England and Wales has...More Info »
The Australian family courts have handed down an anti-suit injunction in the international context of competing divorce proceedings. Given that the...More Info »
The Dutch may have found a way of preventing the leaking of assets through non-disclosure. A particular provision in the Dutch Civil Code might have...More Info »
The British Isles is a curious and confusing family law location! It constantly bewilders family lawyers in other jurisdictions and with very good reason...More Info »
At a time when international travel can be easier and quicker than within national boundaries, can there be any justification for different criteria...More Info »
In my opinion piece dated 5 December, EU justice ministers approve European divorce enhanced cooperation, I referred to the intended new regulation...More Info »
David Hodson is presently on holiday. Hannah Budd is a solicitor at The International Family Law Group. She acts in complex family law cases, often...More Info »
On Friday 4 December 2010, the EU Justice Ministers approved a draft EU Council Regulation about which country's laws should be applied on divorce and...More Info »
Reliable reports indicate that Hong Kong's highest court, the Court of Final Appeal, has just directed that divorced couples must share their assets...More Info »
How do you carry out a search and find (Anton Piller) order when the documentation to be discovered and the purpose of the search, especially electronic...More Info »
A warning that the scam emails in the context of collaborative law are doing the rounds again. All international family lawyers should beware when they...More Info »
David Hodson is presently on holiday. Lucy Loizou is a fluent Greek speaking Solicitor and Associate at The International Family Law Group and acts...More Info »
The 14th Australian National Family Law Conference has just concluded in Canberra. It remains the world's foremost national conference for practising...More Info »
Marital agreements after Radmacher for international families The Supreme Court decision in Radmacher on 20 October 2010 was always going to have significant...More Info »
With the Supreme Court decision in the major premarital agreement case of Radmacher expected within the next month, what should practitioners be looking...More Info »
How much should the family courts of one country interfere with the final decisions of the courts of another country when there has been jurisdiction...More Info »
In many international cases, it is customary to arrange for personal service of the divorce petition and accompanying originating documents, rather...More Info »
Family law in the land of the rising sun and the abducted daughter Leading Japanese family lawyer, Mikiko Otani (email@example.com) has helpfully and...More Info »
Leading Irish family lawyer, Jennifer O'Brien, of Mason Hayes+Curran (www.mhc.ie) has helpfully prepared a briefing paper on the changes in the...More Info »
David Hodson is presently on holiday. Hannah Budd is a solicitor at The International Family Law Group and acts in complex family law cases, often...More Info »
The latest cuts in legal aid, public funding, in England comes on top of dramatic changes announced in 2009. The consequence is to reduce drastically...More Info »
Between 30 June and 2 July 2010 over 150 specialists met in London at the Centre for Family Law and Practice, London Metropolitan University, to discuss...More Info »
There is much controversy across the child abduction world, between Europe and non-European countries, following a decision of the Grand Chamber of...More Info »
London has been described as the "divorce capital of the world", including by Lord Justice Thorpe in Charman , our most senior international family...More Info »
In last week's comment, I referred to the remarks by LJ Thorpe in the Court of Appeal in Golubovich  EWCA 180, a jurisdiction dispute involving...More Info »
The controversial comments made by LJ Thorpe last Tuesday in the Court of Appeal in Golubovich  EWCA 180 raise many issues, on some of which there...More Info »
The Supreme Court decision in Agbaje (2010) UKSC 13 created excellent fairness and justice opportunities for international families to seek some financial...More Info »
Last week the Centre for Family Law and Practice, London Metropolitan University held perhaps the most important international family law conference...More Info »
In the Brussels II race to issue, English solicitors are often first to the chequered flag. But just as we are about to cross the line by issuing...More Info »
As the eyes of the world focus on South Africa this month, attention rightly comes to its distinctive problems such as poverty in its townships and...More Info »
Child abduction is one of the worst events which can occur in the life of a child. It is a criminal offence. It is treated exceptionally seriously...More Info »
On Friday 4 June 2010, the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Council of the EU authorised the first "enhanced cooperation" in the history of the European...More Info »
Provides comprehensive coverage of the international elements of English family law